<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>PinoyTattoos.com - Latest Comments in Sister in Baybayin = SI-TI?</title><link>http://pinoytattoos.disqus.com/</link><description>The #1 source for Filipino Tattoos</description><atom:link href="https://pinoytattoos.disqus.com/sister_in_baybayin_si_ti_pinoytattooscom_filipino_tattoo_source/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:42:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Sister in Baybayin = SI-TI?</title><link>http://www.pinoytattoos.com/sister-in-baybayin-si-ti/#comment-183210836</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Based on the photo, I think the fingers belonged to two separate people - sisters (biological or sorority I'm not sure). In that context, "ate" (older sister) would not be appropriate since they both can't be an "ate". "Kapatid" (sibling) would be more appropriate, but can be too long. If they were biological sisters, then the elder one could have gotten "ate" while the younger could have gotten "bunso" instead. Or they could have used "utol" (though this is slang).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tansero</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:42:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sister in Baybayin = SI-TI?</title><link>http://www.pinoytattoos.com/sister-in-baybayin-si-ti/#comment-1229492</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i like your alibata/baybayin translations.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">icezorg</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 03:00:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sister in Baybayin = SI-TI?</title><link>http://www.pinoytattoos.com/sister-in-baybayin-si-ti/#comment-121071101</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i like your alibata/baybayin translations.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">icezorg</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 03:00:23 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>